MIL-OSI UK: Committee demands action on Government’s strategy for NI’s fisheries post-Brexit

Source: British Parliament News

13 December 2018
The Northern Ireland Affairs Committee has written to Michael Gove, Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs seeking more detail on crucial elements of strategy, after Government response to Committee’s report fails to match urgency of crisis facing NI’s fisheries.

The Committee welcomes the Government’s progress, in line with the Committee’s recommendation, towards securing a ‘Non-Detriment Finding’ for exports of the European Eel after the UK leaves the EU. We await the outcome of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea for scientific peer review on this issue, which is crucial to the economic prosperity of the Lough Neagh area.
The Committee recommended that the Government must be prepared to take decisions on fisheries policy for Northern Ireland post-Brexit if there is no Executive in place to do so. The Government response to the Committee’s report exposes holes in the Government’s preparation for the challenges faced by Northern Ireland’s fisheries sector. The Committee has written to Michael Gove MP to seek further information on the Government’s policy.
Chair of the Committee, Dr Andrew Murrison MP, said:

“The Government is coasting on its plans for Northern Ireland’s fisheries post-Brexit. Key challenges remain unsolved such as the crushing shortage of labour, illegal oyster farming in Lough Foyle and Ireland’s continued suspension of fishing rights under the Voisinage Arrangement.
My Committee is unconvinced that the government’s response on these issues matches the level of urgency facing NI’s fisheries, and we are calling on the Secretary of State to change tack.”

Shortage of labour
In order to alleviate the immediate crisis of workforce shortages in the Northern Ireland fishing fleet, the Committee recommended that the Government make a time limited immigration concession for non-EU fishing crew. In the long-term, it recommended establishing a new visa pathway for the crewing of fishing boats by non-EU nationals. The Government has rejected proposals for a time limited immigration concession and stated that the Migration Advisory Committee has not recommended introducing separate sector-based routes for lower skilled workers.
The solutions proposed by the Government are an apprenticeship scheme and Careers Strategy to attract young people into the industry. However, it is unclear how this will encourage enough young people to fill the gaps and the evidence the Committee heard suggests migrant labour is urgently needed. Similarly, any measures contained in the Immigration White Paper are unlikely to come into force in time to tackle the current issue.
No Deal and access to fish
The Government response does not commit to providing a timetable for delivering a new IT system capable of providing catch certificates for all UK fisheries trade, raising concerns that any digital system will not be ready for 29 March 2019. The Committee’s letter to the Secretary of State presses for a timescale to be produced as soon as possible.
The Government is addressing some aspects of Northern Ireland’s governance gap by amending some secondary legislation on matters relating to fisheries and aquaculture at Westminster. However, in the continued absence of devolved Government, it remains unclear how policy decisions on important issues such as the distribution of new fishing opportunities and implementation of the discard ban will be taken for Northern Ireland. The Fisheries Bill provides “England only” proposals in these areas.
Long-term disputes
The Government’s response demonstrates no commitment to resolve long-running issues such as illegal oyster farming in Lough Foyle and Ireland’s unilateral suspension of the Voisinage arrangement – a long-standing agreement permitting fishing vessels from Northern Ireland and Ireland reciprocal access to each other’s territorial waters.
The Government has ignored the Committee’s suggested deadlines and instead simply reiterated that it is working towards resolution of these issues. The Committee’s letter presses for timescales to be introduced immediately.
Further information
Image: iStockphoto

MIL-OSI UK News

MIL-OSI UK: Minister quizzed on how he’ll implement the EU’s fish discard ban

Source: British Parliament News

11 December 2018
The EU Energy and Environment Sub-Committee continues their inquiry into the implementation and enforcement of the EU landing obligation.

Witness
Wednesday 12 December in Committee Room 2, Palace of WestminsterAt 11.00am
George Eustice MP, Minister of State for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
Background
The Committee have heard from a range of witnesses, including fishermen, conservation organisations and fisheries researchers, about the EU landing obligation. The obligation, which comes fully into force from January 2019, require fishermen to land all fish they catch rather than discard some back into the sea. The Committee have heard concerns about the impact this will have on fishermen’s livelihoods and about the difficulties there will be in monitoring compliance with the new rules.
Likely areas of questioning
Is the UK ready and able to fully implement the landing obligation from January?
What additional resources will be needed to monitor compliance?
What steps are being taken to protect the fishing industry, and how will this be balanced with the need to protect fish stocks and prevent overfishing?
What impact will leaving the EU have on implementing the landing obligation?
Further information
Image: Parliamentary Copyright

MIL-OSI UK News

MIL-OSI UK: Government Ministers quizzed on support for the rural economy

Source: British House Of Lords News

11 December 2018
The Rural Economy Committee questions Lord Henley from the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS); and Jake Berry MP from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) on better support for the rural economy.

Witnesses
Tuesday 11 December in Committee Room 1, Palace of Westminster
At 10.00am
Lord Henley, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, BEIS
At 10.45am
Jake Berry MP, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Minister for the Northern Powerhouse and Local Growth, MHCLG
Suggested questions
Should Local Industrial Strategies be rural proofed, and who by?
The Committee has heard that the performance of LEPs is patchy when it comes to delivering for rural areas. Are they the right body to lead on the development of Local Industrial Strategies?
Can you provide an overview of how BEIS’ ‘place-based approach’ for the industrial strategy will work in practice?
How is MHCLG working with BEIS to ensure that LEPs take account of rural areas when fulfilling their role as the leads for Local Industrial Strategies?
What more can MHCLG be doing to empower rural communities that are less well-resourced?
How will the Shared Prosperity Fund work for rural areas?
Would having a cross-government document setting out the overarching, long-term strategic direction for rural areas (such as a Rural Strategy) be of benefit for MHCLG?
Further information
Image: iStockphoto

MIL-OSI UK News